Agency program
Run donguri under your own name for your own clients, with a multi-client console and white-label reporting.
Solutions
Four teams, one for each link in the AI citation chain. Every deliverable is checked back in the same dashboard that found the problem, so nobody has to take our word for it.
We do not split the work into strategy, content, and media the way an agency would. Each team is named for where it sits in the AI citation chain.
The three execution teams differ by one thing: whose domain the work lives on. That single distinction decides which one you need.
Work on your own site. You carry the domain weight, which makes it slower to start and permanent once it compounds.
Work on third-party sites. You borrow existing authority, and AI trusts a third-party description more than a self-description.
Your own accounts, living on a high-authority platform. First-person voice with platform-level trust behind it.
Services do not run on opinion. The platform issues the work, and the platform signs it off.
Daily tracking across engines shows which questions you lose, to whom, and which sources win them.
Which questions to fight for this cycle, which team executes, and which metric should move.
On your domain, on third-party domains, and on your own accounts. The source mix decides the split.
Thirty to sixty days later the same query set is re-read. What moved gets more budget, what did not gets replaced.
For agencies, media groups, and in-house teams that already have the clients but not the tooling.
Run donguri under your own name for your own clients, with a multi-client console and white-label reporting.
Take the monitoring data by API and put it inside the system your team already uses.
Tell us about your clients and where you operate, and we will map out how the numbers work.
No. SIGNAL plus the platform is the usual starting point, because you need to know which gap matters before paying anyone to close it. The three execution teams are added as the data justifies them.
We do not recommend it, and we will say so. Without monitoring there is no way to choose the target and no way to check the result, which turns the work back into the kind of unverifiable content spend GEO was supposed to replace.
No. AI citation depends on engine behaviour and third-party content, neither of which anyone controls. What we commit to is the method, the execution, and a verifiable change in the numbers.
We write the specification, including schema, heading hierarchy, and rendering. Implementation runs through your engineering resource, which keeps site access on your side.
Get started
Tell us your brand and your market, and we will run a demo showing exactly where you stand in AI answers today.
Book a Demo